Services
24×7×365 Technical Support
Migration to PostgreSQL
High Availability Deployment
Database Audit
Remote DBA for PostgreSQL
Products
Postgres Pro Enterprise
Postgres Pro Standard
Cloud Solutions
Postgres Extensions
Cases
Courses
Resources
Blog
Documentation
Webinars
Videos
Presentations
Community
Events
Books
Demo Database
Mailing List Archives
About
Leadership team
Partners
Customers
In the News
Press Releases
Press Info
Services
24×7×365 Technical Support
Migration to PostgreSQL
High Availability Deployment
Database Audit
Remote DBA for PostgreSQL
Products
Postgres Pro Enterprise
Postgres Pro Standard
Cloud Solutions
Postgres Extensions
Cases
Courses
Resources
Blog
Documentation
Webinars
Videos
Presentations
Community
Events
Books
Demo Database
Mailing List Archives
About
Leadership team
Partners
Customers
In the News
Press Releases
Press Info
Facebook
Request a Demo
Home
>
mailing lists
Re: Startup PANIC on standby promotion due to zero-filled WAL segment - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From
Alena Vinter
Subject
Re: Startup PANIC on standby promotion due to zero-filled WAL segment
Date
December 25
11:47:05
Msg-id
CAGWv16+9r8roFdReY1qV6rcFDi9UdzmjQc+GfKbdvHZMomCqCg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
Raw
In response to
Re: Startup PANIC on standby promotion due to zero-filled WAL segment
(Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List
pgsql-hackers
Tree view
I like the idea of preventing promotion to avoid such failures -- it sounds reasonable.
However, we still have the problem: if the standby is stopped with non-replicated TLI 2, it will fail to start:
"FATAL: according to history file, WAL location Y belongs to timeline X, but previous recovered WAL file came from timeline X+1".
This happens even if no promotion is attempted — just a plain restart of the standby. So the issue isn’t only about when to allow promotion.
Regarding my proposed solution: could you clarify why it isn’t correct? I’d appreciate more detail so I can address your concerns.
---
Alena Vinter
Attachment
recovery_tli_switch_test_without_standby_promotion_replica.log
recovery_tli_switch_test_without_standby_promotion.pl
pgsql-hackers
by date:
Previous
From:
Dilip Kumar
Date:
25 December, 10:40:34
Subject:
Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
Next
From:
Konstantin Knizhnik
Date:
25 December, 11:56:50
Subject:
Re: index prefetching
Есть вопросы? Напишите нам!
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных
×
I confirm that I have read and accepted PostgresPro’s
Privacy Policy
.
I agree to get Postgres Pro discount offers and other marketing communications.
✖
×
×
Everywhere
Documentation
Mailing list
List:
all lists
pgsql-general
pgsql-hackers
buildfarm-members
pgadmin-hackers
pgadmin-support
pgsql-admin
pgsql-advocacy
pgsql-announce
pgsql-benchmarks
pgsql-bugs
pgsql-chat
pgsql-cluster-hackers
pgsql-committers
pgsql-cygwin
pgsql-docs
pgsql-hackers-pitr
pgsql-hackers-win32
pgsql-interfaces
pgsql-jdbc
pgsql-jobs
pgsql-novice
pgsql-odbc
pgsql-patches
pgsql-performance
pgsql-php
pgsql-pkg-debian
pgsql-pkg-yum
pgsql-ports
pgsql-rrreviewers
pgsql-ru-general
pgsql-sql
pgsql-students
pgsql-testers
pgsql-translators
pgsql-www
psycopg
Period
anytime
within last day
within last week
within last month
within last 6 months
within last year
Sort by
date
reverse date
rank
Services
24×7×365 Technical Support
Migration to PostgreSQL
High Availability Deployment
Database Audit
Remote DBA for PostgreSQL
Products
Postgres Pro Enterprise
Postgres Pro Standard
Cloud Solutions
Postgres Extensions
Cases
Courses
Resources
Blog
Documentation
Webinars
Videos
Presentations
Community
Events
Books
Demo Database
Mailing List Archives
About
Leadership team
Partners
Customers
In the News
Press Releases
Press Info
By continuing to browse this website, you agree to the use of cookies. Go to
Privacy Policy
.
I accept cookies