Re: Re[2]: [PERFORM] SMP on a heavy loaded database - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Claudio Freire
Subject Re: Re[2]: [PERFORM] SMP on a heavy loaded database
Date
Msg-id CAGTBQpb8=RcMC5x6tH8aF5eJ53Y+=UX_x2=ksgQskWjitDzSvg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re[4]: [PERFORM] Re[2]: [PERFORM] SMP on a heavy loaded database  (nobody nowhere <devnull@mail.ua>)
List pgsql-performance
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 6:07 PM, nobody nowhere <devnull@mail.ua> wrote:
>  9092 postgres  16   0 4326m  41m  34m S  0.0  0.3   0:00.27 14 postgres: user user_db [local] idle
>  9098 postgres  16   0 4329m 203m 194m S  3.5  1.3   0:00.65 14 postgres: user user_db [local] idle
>  9099 postgres  16   0 4327m  45m  38m S  0.0  0.3   0:00.41 14 postgres: user user_db [local] idle

That looks like pg has been pinned to CPU14. I don't think it's pg's
doing. All I can think of is: check scheduler tweaks, numa, and pg's
initscript. Just in case it's being pinned explicitly.


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: nobody nowhere
Date:
Subject: Re[4]: [PERFORM] Re[2]: [PERFORM] SMP on a heavy loaded database
Next
From: Daniel Westermann
Date:
Subject: Re: FW: performance issue with a 2.5gb joinded table