Re: TCP Overhead on Local Loopback - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Claudio Freire
Subject Re: TCP Overhead on Local Loopback
Date
Msg-id CAGTBQpZfvX7LznT35+WFQMZKUMuogqDFRLnky3BWRUz9-bFVRg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TCP Overhead on Local Loopback  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: TCP Overhead on Local Loopback  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-performance
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>> You could try using Unix domain socket and see if the performance
>> improves. A relevant link:
>
>
> He said Windows. There are no Unix domain sockets on Windows. (And please
> don't top-post)

Windows supports named pipes, which are functionally similar, but I
don't think pg supports them.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: TCP Overhead on Local Loopback
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: TCP Overhead on Local Loopback