Re: Policy for Abandoned Extensions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From shihao zhong
Subject Re: Policy for Abandoned Extensions
Date
Msg-id CAGRkXqTteK5W4ztfqexvf-HidKraE9JddDG0Q1THmtNryLALVw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Policy for Abandoned Extensions  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>)
Responses Re: Policy for Abandoned Extensions
List pgsql-hackers
Hi David,

I(with fable) pulled some numbers from master.pgxn.org today.

For 218 of the 496 distributions the last PGXN release is more than five years old. I checked the repositories with a script and looked at the unclear ones one by one.

- 51 are alive upstream. 37 at the repository in META.json, for example hll and rum, and 14 that moved, for example mongo_fdw and redis_fdw.
- 13 were replaced by something in core.
- 32 had some activity two to five years ago, or I could not tell.
- 122 show no sign of life for five years. 70 of them ship C code.

Only 3 of the 122 are still packaged in the PGDG apt or yum repositories for 17 and 18.

So the dead and still shipped set looks small. The 51 look like a different case, the project is alive but nobody releases on PGXN. A pointer to upstream may be enough there.

I may have missed some moves, so 122 is an upper bound. I can send the table if you want more detailed data. 

Thanks,
Shihao

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: Policy for Abandoned Extensions
Next
From: Zsolt Parragi
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication