Re: Support NOT VALID / VALIDATE constraint options for named NOT NULL constraints - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Rushabh Lathia
Subject Re: Support NOT VALID / VALIDATE constraint options for named NOT NULL constraints
Date
Msg-id CAGPqQf2so0xrznT9sFjFFROnDgpbnAQbs2vg71QdC295afjm5Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support NOT VALID / VALIDATE constraint options for named NOT NULL constraints  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Support NOT VALID / VALIDATE constraint options for named NOT NULL constraints
Re: Support NOT VALID / VALIDATE constraint options for named NOT NULL constraints
List pgsql-hackers

Hi Alvaro,

Here are the latest patches, which includes the regression fix.

Thanks,




On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 3:38 PM Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 3:20 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>
> On 2025-Mar-12, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>
> > If the test passes for you, can you please try the patches at [1] on
> > top of your patches? Please apply those, set and export environment
> > variable PG_TEST_EXTRA=regress_dump_test, and run 002_pg_upgrade test?
> > I intended to do this but can not do it since the test always fails
> > with your patches applied.
>
> Oh, I need to enable a PG_TEST_EXTRA option in order for the test to
> run?  FFS.  That explains why the tests passed just fine for me.
> I'll re-run.

You need PG_TEST_EXTRA to run the testcase I am adding there. Rest of
the testcases run without PG_TEST_EXTRA.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat


--
Rushabh Lathia
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel heap vacuum
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: Test mail for pgsql-hackers