Re: Support a wildcard in backtrace_functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jelte Fennema-Nio
Subject Re: Support a wildcard in backtrace_functions
Date
Msg-id CAGECzQThxK+ZNLNasmiMXXN_TfUJEVDC49pZ2LB_aSvjW2tigA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support a wildcard in backtrace_functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 at 16:40, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> If there's no place where
> that can plausibly be done, maybe you don't need the typedef after
> all?

Makes sense, I removed the unused LogBacktraceVerbosity typedef now.
It caused a rebase conflict just now, so this also solves that.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Add semi-join pushdown to postgres_fdw
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Add Pipelining support in psql