Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jelte Fennema-Nio
Subject Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM`
Date
Msg-id CAGECzQTfMbDiM6W3av+3weSnHxJvPmuTEcjxVvSt91sQBdOxuQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM`  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM`
Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM`
Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM`
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 at 02:24, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> Agree. I don’t think “_command” adds much clarity.

Alright, changed the GUC name to "allow_alter_system" since that seems
to have the most "votes". One other option would be to call it simply
"alter_system", just like "jit" is not called "allow_jit" or
"enable_jit".

But personally I feel that the "allow_alter_system" is clearer than
plain "alter_system" for the GUC name.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Allow using syncfs() in frontend utilities.
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects