Re: Refactoring backend fork+exec code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jelte Fennema-Nio
Subject Re: Refactoring backend fork+exec code
Date
Msg-id CAGECzQTR5MNnHuEH7Es06Q1Bufse2etO5McRKqd0+2Skc+W2DQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Refactoring backend fork+exec code  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
Responses Re: Refactoring backend fork+exec code
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 08:16, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
> Yeah, it's not a very valuable assertion. Removed, thanks!

How about we add it as a static assert instead of removing it, like we
have for many other similar arrays.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Lakhin
Date:
Subject: Re: Test 031_recovery_conflict.pl is not immune to autovacuum
Next
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation