Re: Proposal: Document ABI Compatibility - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jelte Fennema-Nio
Subject Re: Proposal: Document ABI Compatibility
Date
Msg-id CAGECzQTJSd+sCYq2m_RcDzp0EUh9226hc6B=Qm_dYpR7UhP45Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal: Document ABI Compatibility  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
Responses Re: Proposal: Document ABI Compatibility
Re: Proposal: Document ABI Compatibility
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 at 14:44, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
> I think since around 6 years ago we have been much more vigilant about
> avoiding ABI breaks.  So if there aren't any more recent examples of
> breakage, then maybe that was ultimately successful, and the upshot is,
> continue to be vigilant at about the same level?

While not strictly an ABI break I guess, the backport of 32d5a4974c81
broke building Citus against 13.10 and 14.7[1].

[1]: https://github.com/citusdata/citus/pull/6711



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Markus Winand
Date:
Subject: Re: ON ERROR in json_query and the like
Next
From: Michail Nikolaev
Date:
Subject: Re: race condition in pg_class