Re: cfbot mistakenly reports that a rebase is needed - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jelte Fennema-Nio
Subject Re: cfbot mistakenly reports that a rebase is needed
Date
Msg-id CAGECzQSSskLnB5kNNR7KPAxNd5HbRR2hB+_Gk3-W6v5xD9Gw3A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: cfbot mistakenly reports that a rebase is needed  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 at 16:39, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@tigerdata.com> writes:
> > I keep an eye on my patches using cfbog [1] and I think since recently
> > it started to mistakenly mark patches as "needs rebase" while in fact
> > everything is OK. If we take [2] for instance, it applies fine:
>
> Yeah, I have observed the same with my patches (according to [1],
> two of 'em need rebase right now, though the underlying 'git am' logs
> report success).  In some past occurrences the gripe has gone away
> without my doing anything...
>
>                         regards, tom lane
>
> [1] http://cfbot.cputube.org/tom-lane.html

Took a quick look, and publicly noting my findings: Interestingly none
of these patches show up as "needs rebase" in the commitfest app. So
it seems that this is a cfbot webpage generation bug.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for 8-byte TOAST values (aka the TOAST infinite loop problem)
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: index prefetching