Re: Commitfest PG20-2 is now closed - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jelte Fennema-Nio
Subject Re: Commitfest PG20-2 is now closed
Date
Msg-id CAGECzQS0VbGV8K6OHeFbMcC3kHWZP6xO90pWj_-xQHscoDAT=w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Commitfest PG20-2 is now closed  (Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Commitfest PG20-2 is now closed
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 1 Oct 2026 at 11:01, Jacob Champion
<jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2026 at 1:28 AM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de> wrote:
> > IMO all patches tagged "Bugfix" should be moved forward, regardless of
> > thread noise level or whether CI is clean or not.  At the same time,
> > it's probably appropriate for the CFM to remove the Bugfix tag from
> > entries that aren't backpatchable bugfixes, and it's also OK to close
> > entries as "rejected" or "withdrawn" as appropriate.
>
> +1

Yeah agreed, should be easy to fix



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Burd
Date:
Subject: Let an ordering index scan hand its ORDER BY value to the target list
Next
From: Alexandre Felipe
Date:
Subject: Throwing away unnecessary spin-locks