Re: Correct documentation for protocol version - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jelte Fennema-Nio
Subject Re: Correct documentation for protocol version
Date
Msg-id CAGECzQRaK8Vg_ova1sMwPugS6MW1tJZsnEpimAQTEkt62Ai+VQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Correct documentation for protocol version  (Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 29 May 2025 at 13:12, Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com> wrote:
> Agreed that nobody upgrades a client from 2.0 but is there value in keeping the history ?

Yeah, maybe.

> Perhaps another section which would be "Changes in 3.x" ?

If we decide to keep it I think it would be best to have all protocol
changes on a single page. I'd just put the changes from 2.0 to 3.0 at
the bottom of the page.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Replication slot is not able to sync up
Next
From: Andrei Lepikhov
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Job Scheduler