On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 at 01:08, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> I don't want to add 4 bytes to struct pg_conn for tracing support. I'm
> tempted to make the new struct member a plain 'char' to reduce overhead
> for a feature that almost nobody is going to use. According to pahole
> we have a 3 bytes hole in that position of the struct, so if we make it
> a 1- or 2-byte member, there's no storage overhead whatsoever.
Sounds fine to me.
> Also, why not have pqTraceOutputMessage() responsible for resetting the
> byte after printing the message? It seems to cause less undesirable
> detritus.
Yeah, that's indeed much nicer.
> I propose something like the attached, but it's as yet untested. What
> do you think?
Looks good, but I haven't tested it yet either.
