Re: Allow +group in pg_ident.conf - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jelte Fennema
Subject Re: Allow +group in pg_ident.conf
Date
Msg-id CAGECzQQL2zuFxy+nnfouR0y+N0oMsmpMysjgCmQj3aT1116kBA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Allow +group in pg_ident.conf  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Allow +group in pg_ident.conf
List pgsql-hackers
I'm working on a new patchset for my commitfest entry. I'll make sure
to include a third patch for the +group support, and I'll include you
(Andrew) in the thread when I send it.

On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 at 02:14, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 09:42:19AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > Ok, that sounds reasonable, but the cfbot doesn't like patches that
> > depend on other patches in a different email. Maybe you can roll this up
> > as an extra patch in your next version? It's pretty small.
>
> This can go two ways if both of you agree, by sending an updated patch
> on this thread based on the other one..  And actually, Jelte's patch
> has less C code than this thread's proposal, eventhough it lacks
> tests.
> --
> Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format
Next
From: Jelte Fennema
Date:
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH] Support using "all" for the db user in pg_ident.conf