Re: Is there any way that one of the Postgres Background/Utilityprocess may go down? - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Rajni Baliyan
Subject Re: Is there any way that one of the Postgres Background/Utilityprocess may go down?
Date
Msg-id CAG5RORN99uPKQM1jo+B383scQ9xPcBrv-3Y_dSGAjF2iQm7RGQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is there any way that one of the Postgres Background/Utilityprocess may go down?  (rajan <vgmonnet@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Is there any way that one of the Postgres Background/Utilityprocess may go down?  (rajan <vgmonnet@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-admin
It depends what is the requirement.
If you just need to monitor whether Postgres is up and running then monitoring postmaster will be sufficient but if you also want to monitor other processes like autovacuum, wal sender etc then include corresponding processes as well.

Regards
Rajni

On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 at 7:43 pm rajan <vgmonnet@gmail.com> wrote:
It is a custom script which we have developed for *monitoring the
processes(only)*. That is why I am asking if adding the postmaster alone
would suffice, or I should add all the background process names?

PS: These process checks are just to make sure that postgres is running.



-----
--
Thanks,
Rajan.
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-admin-f2076596.html

--
Thanks
Regards,
Rajni
0410472086

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: rajan
Date:
Subject: Re: Is there any way that one of the Postgres Background/Utilityprocess may go down?
Next
From: rajan
Date:
Subject: Re: Is there any way that one of the Postgres Background/Utilityprocess may go down?