Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned tables vs GRANT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Keith Fiske
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned tables vs GRANT
Date
Msg-id CAG1_KcBX2Lmr8w4t8ihNdEjXSYdCwR2VqCR5Gebr=ZUdqQj8+A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned tables vs GRANT  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned tables vs GRANT  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> Apparently INSERT and SELECT on the parent partitioned table skip normal
> acl checks on the partitions. Is that intended behavior?

Yes, this matches normal inheritance behavior.

                        regards, tom lane


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Should that really be normal partitioning behavior though? Pretty sure people would expect child tables to have consistent permissions in a partition set and I'd think setting them on the parent should be what they expect the children to have.

Keith

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve 64bit atomics support.