Hi,
While reviewing nbtdedup.c I noticed a minor type mismatch in
_bt_singleval_fillfactor(). The local variable 'reduction' is declared
as 'int', but it holds the result of multiplying 'leftfree' (which is
type Size, i.e. size_t / unsigned long) by a double factor, and is
then subtracted from state->maxpostingsize, which is also Size.
Using a signed int here is semantically incorrect: Size is the
appropriate type for any variable representing a byte count, and
it matches the type of every other variable involved in this
calculation.
While no overflow occurs with current BLCKSZ limits (the product is
at most ~30KB on a standard build, well within INT_MAX), the type
mismatch could silently produce incorrect behaviour on non-standard
builds compiled with a very large BLCKSZ. In that case, if the
product exceeded INT_MAX, 'reduction' would wrap to a large negative
number. The subsequent check:
if (state->maxpostingsize > reduction)
state->maxpostingsize -= reduction;
would then subtract a negative value, i.e. increase maxpostingsize
instead of reducing it, silently defeating the single-value fill
strategy entirely.
The fix is a one-line change: declare 'reduction' as Size instead
of int.
A patch file is attached.
Thanks & Regards,
Jhon k Postgres Specialist
Project & IT Department
Cybrosys Technologies |
| Mail Mobile WhatsApp
| postgress@cybrosys.com +91 8606827707 +91 8606827707
|