Re: pg_restore - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Craig James
Subject Re: pg_restore
Date
Msg-id CAFwQ8rdkFABM592Wowe-5zgqe6zoq-Da5TMzXJ8woz0HW9ivrQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_restore  (Kasia Tuszynska <ktuszynska@esri.com>)
Responses Re: pg_restore  ("McKinzie, Alan (Alan)" <alanmck@avaya.com>)
List pgsql-admin


On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Kasia Tuszynska <ktuszynska@esri.com> wrote:

Hi Everybody,

Has anyone ran into issues running pg_restore?

It seems that between 8.3.8 and 9.0.5, 9.1.3 the behavior of pg_restore has changed.

 

Previously I was able to have several data owners with their own schemas and running a pg_restore as one superuser was able to restore the objects in those schemas without an issue.

 

At 9.0.5, I found that I had to restore each schema of a data owner separately.

At 9.1.3,  I found that in addition to that I need to make each of those data owners superusers.

 

I am fully aware that the dev work for core replication was occurring at this time, but I have been unable to find any documentation about the potential changes to the basic pg_restore functionality.


I recently restored a database using 9.2.1 that has a number of schemas, each with a separate owner, and had no problems at all.

Craig
 

 

Anyone else noticed or had issues with this?

 

Sincerely,

Kasia


pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Kasia Tuszynska
Date:
Subject: pg_restore
Next
From: Dev Kumkar
Date:
Subject: Re: ODBC constructs