Re: Channel binding for post-quantum cryptography - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Filip Janus
Subject Re: Channel binding for post-quantum cryptography
Date
Msg-id CAFjYY++_eihHzuMTGVAw+kU-01OwtHSPWUFZjfwZoGM2stzmXQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Channel binding for post-quantum cryptography  (Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>)
Responses Re: Channel binding for post-quantum cryptography
List pgsql-hackers
Thank you for posting it there. If I understand correctly, the resolution should be to use internal hash algorithms — in this case, SHAKE.
Now, the question is whether to wait for the implementation of a public API to make the change as general as possible, or to try implementing it on the PG side?

    -Filip-


st 29. 10. 2025 v 6:17 odesílatel Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> napsal:
I posted (including your attachment, by accident, since at first I was
going to forward your post) about this to the IETF TLS WG mailing list.

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/CEaZg1l-4iVg0_wdEr5_rXfGYWc/

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: another autovacuum scheduling thread
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Logical Replication of sequences