Re: [HACKERS] ALTER TABLE parent SET WITHOUT OIDS and the oid column - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: [HACKERS] ALTER TABLE parent SET WITHOUT OIDS and the oid column
Date
Msg-id CAFjFpRfjZXhGoQVHkUvq_2LeXqq7Jd1ygp4s+Z4yW7jZzAR81Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] ALTER TABLE parent SET WITHOUT OIDS and the oid column  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
>
>> The code updating attinhcount and then updating the catalogs is same
>> for user defined attributes and OID. Should we separate it out into a
>> function and use that function instead of duplicating the code?
>
> Didn't really seem worth the trouble ... maybe if it gets any longer
> it'd be appropriate to do that.

Ok.

>
> Pushed with those corrections and some further fooling with the test case.
>

Thanks.

-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Supporting huge pages on Windows
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size