Re: Partitioning with temp tables is broken - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: Partitioning with temp tables is broken
Date
Msg-id CAFjFpRfbQJnf=i69uK5horeVyh+2ZyOf=u7+tOo9hXcq09OKzg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Partitioning with temp tables is broken  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Partitioning with temp tables is broken
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 4:22 PM, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> I was under the impression that this was implied in the precious
> phrasing but you guys visibly don't match with my impression.  So I
> would suggest this paragraph at the end:
> "Mixing temporary and permanent relations in the same partition tree is
> not allowed.  Hence, if the partitioned table is permanent, so must be
> its partitions at all levels and likewise if the partitioned table is

You don't need to mention "at all levels", its implied recursively.

-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Partitioning with temp tables is broken
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL prefetch