Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tablesare not supported - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tablesare not supported
Date
Msg-id CAFjFpReorwO6e4em=xtBMaeniEyFWX2HMKTp-6feHtPuVKY3eQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tablesare not supported  (Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:51 AM, Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net> wrote:
>
> So +1 for thinking we do need to worry about it. I'm not exactly sure
> how we want to expose that info; with \d+ we list various "Partition
> X:" sections, perhaps adding one for "Partition triggers:" would be
> enough, although I am inclined to think it needs exposure at the \d
> level.

Something like this or what Alvaro proposed will be helpful.

-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Slow planning time for simple query
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tablesare not supported