Re: [HACKERS] no test coverage for ALTER FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER nameHANDLER ... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: [HACKERS] no test coverage for ALTER FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER nameHANDLER ...
Date
Msg-id CAFjFpReL0oeN7SCpnsEPbqJhB2Bp1wnH1uvbOF_w6KEuv6ZXvg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] no test coverage for ALTER FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER nameHANDLER ...  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] no test coverage for ALTER FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER nameHANDLER ...  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>>
>> Ok. May be then create_function_1.sql is the right place. Just add it
>> to the section of passing tests and annotate that it's testing
>> creating an FDW handler. Sorry for jumping back and forth.
>
> Alright, done.  Thanks for reviewing.
>

LGTM. The patch applies cleanly on the current HEAD, compiles (small
bit in regress.c requires compilation), and make check passes. Marking
this as "ready for committer".

-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Log LDAP "diagnostic messages"?
Next
From: Jesper Pedersen
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Fix performance degradation of contended LWLock on NUMA