Re: Doubt about boundParams - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: Doubt about boundParams
Date
Msg-id CAFjFpRdwK9AW0SXKKfcu8FgRyv_7=bnLHxDMUZX2f7kc26Cz_A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Doubt about boundParams  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
On 02.08.2011 12:54, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
Hi All,
I am looking at usage of bound parameters.

In functions SPI_cursor_open_with_args() and SPI_cursor_open_with_args()
parameters are flagged as constants and passed to the planner in following
manner,
paramLI = _SPI_convert_params(nargs, argtypes,
                                   Values, Nulls,
                                   PARAM_FLAG_CONST);

 _SPI_prepare_plan(src,&plan, paramLI);

The bound params "paramLI" are then passed to the planner as boundParams.
Before actually planning the query, these parameters are evaluated duing
constant evaluation (eval_const_expressions_mutator()), and the Param nodes
are replaced with Constant nodes.
Further, while executing such queries we pass the paramLI structure to the
execution routine e.g. _SPI_execute_plan(). These parameter values are
stored in "EState" structure. But, since these parameters are already folded
into queries, it looks like parameter values stored in EState are never
used.

Is this correct? Or somewhere we use those parameter values?

That is correct, at the moment. PARAM_FLAG_CONST means that the planner is free evaluate the params during planning, but it doesn't have to. You still need to pass the params in _SPI_execute_plan() in case the planner decided to not convert some params to Consts, even though as the code stands today it always will.

Ok, thanks.
 

--
 Heikki Linnakangas
 EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com



--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EntepriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise Postgres Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Doubt about boundParams
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Hot standby and GiST page splits (was Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build)