Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
Date
Msg-id CAFjFpRdhto9etc1KC-GR_7GB+_Z_sT7zy+vjg_=qvsh8mMVh6A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 9:12 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It's possible that we might find that neither of the above approaches
> are practical and that the performance benefits of resolving the
> transaction from the original connection are large enough that we want
> to try to make it work anyhow.  However, I think we can postpone that
> work to a future time.  Any general solution to this problem at least
> needs to be ABLE to resolve transactions at a later time from a
> different session, so let's get that working first, and then see what
> else we want to do.
>
+1.

-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [sqlsmith] crash in RestoreLibraryState duringlow-memory testing
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [sqlsmith] crash in RestoreLibraryState during low-memory testing