Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
Date
Msg-id CAFjFpRdf_BAoCW1a3Ba5cXZGnXhuZq=W7qPEan6mWPYSmySapQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning  (amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 10:03 AM, amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Collation is only relevant for ordering, not equality.

While earlier, I thought the same, I am wondering whether this is
true. Don't different collations deem different strings equal e.g one
collation may deem 'aa' and 'AA' as same but other may not. Or is that
encoding problem being discussed in hash functions thread?

Sorry for the confusion.

-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vaishnavi Prabakaran
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] COPY FROM STDIN behaviour on end-of-file
Next
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Event triggers + table partitioning cause server crash in current master