Re: minor fix for acquire_inherited_sample_rows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: minor fix for acquire_inherited_sample_rows
Date
Msg-id CAFjFpRdaTT+Z6q8X5CZAURHh0oiHEo+CruQBhgNoKBM3sorBHA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: minor fix for acquire_inherited_sample_rows  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 8:46 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> Hello Amit
>
> Amit Langote wrote:
>
>> acquire_inherited_sample_rows() currently uses equalTupleDescs() being
>> false as the condition for going to tupconv.c to determine whether tuple
>> conversion is needed.  But equalTupleDescs() will always return false if
>> it's passed TupleDesc's of two different tables, which is the most common
>> case here.  So I first thought we should just unconditionally go to
>> tupconv.c, but there is still one case where we don't need to, which is
>> the case where the child table is same as the parent table.  However, it
>> would be much cheaper to just check if the relation OIDs are different
>> instead of calling equalTupleDescs, which the attached patch teaches it to do.
>
> When (not if) we get around to updating equalTupleDescs to cope, we will
> need this call right where it is (and we'd have a hard time finding this
> potential callsite later, I think).  If this were a hot spot I would be
> happy to change it, but it's not so I'd rather leave it alone.
>
+1




-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: minor fix for acquire_inherited_sample_rows
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: minor fix for acquire_inherited_sample_rows