Re: [HACKERS] Fix a typo in README.dependencies - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Fix a typo in README.dependencies
Date
Msg-id CAFjFpRd03YojT4wyuDcjhCfYuygfWfnt68XGn2CKv=rcjRCtTA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Fix a typo in README.dependencies  (atorikoshi <torikoshi_atsushi_z2@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Fix a typo in README.dependencies  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 8:22 AM, atorikoshi
<torikoshi_atsushi_z2@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found below formula to compute selectivities, but
> I think the last Probability 'P(b=?)' should be 'P(c=?)'.
>
>>  P(a=?,b=?,c=?) = P(a=?,b=?) * (d + (1-d)*P(b=?))
>
>
> Attached patch fixes it, and it also adds some spaces
> following another formula which is on line 86 and
> computes P(a=?, b=?).

Agree. Also using "d" for "degree of functional dependence (b=>c) as
well is confusing. We are already using "d" for "degree of functional
dependence (a=>b). Here' patch to use "d'" instead of "d".

-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rafia Sabih
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.
Next
From: Sokolov Yura
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Fix performance degradation of contended LWLock on NUMA