Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: >> I am marking this as Ready For Committer, the patch is trivial and works >> as expected, there is nothing to be added to it IMHO. >> >> The "=>" operator was deprecated for several years so it should not be too >> controversial either.
> Committed with a few documentation tweaks.
Was there any consideration given to whether ruleutils should start printing NamedArgExprs with "=>"? Or do we think that needs to wait?
I didn't think about it? I don't see any reason why it have to use deprecated syntax.