Re: new gcc warning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: new gcc warning
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRDPMG5OEDS0NSZmdbTuWnX2Z9Z_AtaZp+CcwL1pVqVqmw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: new gcc warning  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers


2016-09-01 18:40 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> 2016-09-01 14:31 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>> That should have gone away in commit a2fd62dd5.  What version are
>> you looking at?

> I am checking 9.5 branch and I cannot to find this commit there

Hmm ... it wasn't back-patched, evidently.  We don't have a clear
project policy on whether to back-patch changes that are only meant
to silence useless warnings, but it seems reasonable to push this
one, since gcc 6 is getting more widespread.

Thank you

Pavel
 

                        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: System load consideration before spawning parallel workers
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: System load consideration before spawning parallel workers