Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRD5b0WZBw8p-8vvvjhFHhhEO1uBvDi_apkygj2t_j9gaw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c  (dinesh kumar <dineshkumar02@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c
Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c
List pgsql-hackers


2015-07-17 0:03 GMT+02:00 dinesh kumar <dineshkumar02@gmail.com>:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi

can we support multiple "-c" option?

Why? Because some statements like VACUUM cannot be used together with any other statements with single -c option. The current solution is using echo and pipe op, but it is a complication in some complex scripts - higher complication when you run psql via multiple sudo statement.

Example:

psql -c "select pg_stat_reset()" -c "vacuum full analyze" dbname

or on all db

psql -At -c "select datname from pg_databases" postgres | \
xargs -n 1 -P 3 psql -c "..." -c "..."

Ideas, notes, comments?


IMO, rather having multiple -c args, it would be good to have another flag like "-C" which do accept and execute multiple SQL statements in sequential.

it is one possible solution too

multiple -c option has advantage of simple evaluation of backslash statements .. -c "\l" -c "\dt" - but this advantage is not high important.

Pavel

 

Best Regards,
Dinesh
 
Regards

Pavel


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Map basebackup tablespaces using a tablespace_map file
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2