> * SELECT (xmltable(..)).* + regress tests > * compilation and regress tests without --with-libxml
Thanks. I just realized that this is doing more work than necessary --
?? I don't understand?
I think it would be simpler to have tableexpr fill a tuplestore with the results, instead of just expecting function execution to apply ExecEvalExpr over and over to obtain the results. So evaluating a tableexpr returns just the tuplestore, which function evaluation can return as-is. That code doesn't use the value-per-call interface anyway.
ok
I also realized that the expr context callback is not called if there's an error, which leaves us without shutting down libxml properly. I added PG_TRY around the fetchrow calls, but I'm not sure that's correct either, because there could be an error raised in other parts of the code, after we've already emitted a few rows (for example out of memory). I think the right way is to have PG_TRY around the execution of the whole thing rather than just row at a time; and the tuplestore mechanism helps us with that.
ok.
I think it would be good to have a more complex test case in regress -- let's say there is a table with some simple XML values, then we use XMLFOREST (or maybe one of the table_to_xml functions) to generate a large document, and then XMLTABLE uses that document as input document.
