Re: [HACKERS] possibility to specify template database for pg_regress - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: [HACKERS] possibility to specify template database for pg_regress
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRCjhygpW5mZYoSw9s6J5rQmLAVmo6usG9h2hcPXP_4ctg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] possibility to specify template database for pg_regress  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] possibility to specify template database for pg_regress  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


2017-02-08 8:30 GMT+01:00 Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> What is sense for list of databases?

ECPG uses it for example, see 0992259.

> Some option --template can be great - with backpatch if it is possible.

That's not really complicated to patch... That could be a nice task
for a starter.

Today I am doing some training - I can look on it at evening

Regards

Pavel
 
--
Michael

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] possibility to specify template database for pg_regress
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)