Hello
2011/10/8 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com> writes:
>> it is selecting 20 rows out of 30 million. why is it:
>> 1. not using index only scan
>> 2. not using even normal index scan?
>
> It thinks the bitmap scan is cheaper. Whether that's true or not is not
> very clear, but nobody is claiming that the costing of index-only scans
> is accurate yet.
>
I did a few tests and bitmap scan is faster. Maybe there is a some
issue. In very simple test (and very syntetic test)
create table omega(a int);
insert into omega select (random()*10000)::int from generate_series(1,400000);
select count(*) from omega where a = 100;
and index scan is faster than index only scan. There is lot of
duplicates. When I used a bigger range, a speed of bitmap index, index
only scan and index scan is similar - but index scan was faster
everywhere.
Regards
Pavel Stehule
> regards, tom lane
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
