Re: [GENERAL] Receive a string in Composite-type Arguments - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Receive a string in Composite-type Arguments
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRCTNW40+JjgnG1y6Sw=-LQ1L9UfEnhdjBUMS5rgp87JyQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Receive a string in Composite-type Arguments  (Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>)
List pgsql-general


2017-08-11 16:39 GMT+02:00 Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>:
On 11/08/2017 16:09, Fabiana Zioti wrote:

Hi!

I am studying how to program extensions for PostgreSQL in C language.

In the example to return to return Composite-type Arguments, from the PostgreSQL 9.6 documentation, I could not make the cash from a cstring to the HeapTupleHeader type.

That is, instead of the function receive as a parameter a table:

CREATE FUNCTION c_overpaid (emp, integer) RETURNS boolean
AS DIRECTORY

SELECT name, c_overpaid (emp, 1500) AS overpaid
     From emp
     WHERE name = 'Bill' OR name = 'Sam';

And in the code in C receive the argument as:

HeapTupleHeader t = PG_GETARG_HEAPTUPLEHEADER (0);


The sql function would be defined as:

CREATE FUNCTION c_overpaid (cstring, integer) RETURNS boolean
     AS 'DIRECTORY / funcs', 'c_overpaid'
     LANGUAGE C STRICT;

But how would I receive this argument, for example:
Char * str = PG_GETARG_CSTRING (0),

And do the conversion to the HeapTupleHeader type?


Hi

you have to build tuple first. Later you can got a HeapTupleHeader

pl_toolbox has some functions for composite types


Regards

Pavel Stehule
 


Why do you want to convert this to HeapTupleHeader since this is *not* a tuple but a string value? What do you want to achieve? IMHO you better start with simpler examples, make them run, and proceed as you understand more and more.


What do you guys suggest?

Thanks in advance


-- 
Achilleas Mantzios
IT DEV Lead
IT DEPT
Dynacom Tankers Mgmt

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Achilleas Mantzios
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Receive a string in Composite-type Arguments
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Fwd: 2 process postgres -D for one instance