Re: [HACKERS] v10beta pg_catalog diagrams - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: [HACKERS] v10beta pg_catalog diagrams
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRCHTBBsW+0xE6bvSyLW4wg5nG-S46Eg-XbMm9rOPUudcA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] v10beta pg_catalog diagrams  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] v10beta pg_catalog diagrams  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers


2017-06-14 5:53 GMT+02:00 Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>:
On 6/13/17 17:08, Andres Freund wrote:
> I wondered before if we shouldn't introduce "information only"
> unenforced foreign key constraints for the catalogs.  We kind of
> manually do that via oidjoins, it'd be nicer if we'd a function
> rechecking fkeys, and the fkeys were in the catalog...

I don't see why we couldn't just add a full complement of primary and
foreign key constraints (and unique constraints and perhaps some check
constraints).  The argument is that they wouldn't normally do anything,
but they would help with documentation and browsing tools, and they
wouldn't hurt anything.


These constraints can slowdown creating/dropping database objects - mainly temp tables.

Regards

Pavel
 
--
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_receivewal and messages printed in non-verbose mode
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Dropping partitioned table drops a previously detached partition