Re: documentation bug - missing info about unpackaged control files for extension - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: documentation bug - missing info about unpackaged control files for extension
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRCGZT5qq9ZqookVGAiA3gAj7KfGf56udPwX1t3_79pXdw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: documentation bug - missing info about unpackaged control files for extension  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
2012/4/15 Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>:
> On 15.04.2012 13:47, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>> is somewhere documented sense of foo--unpackaged--version.sql files?
>
>
> See section 35.15.4. Extension Updates, paragraph starting with "The update
> mechanism can be used to solve an important special case: converting a
> "loose" collection of objects into an extension."
>

I understand better now.

Thank you

Pavel

> --
>  Heikki Linnakangas
>  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #6572: The example of SPI_execute is bogus
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix PL/Python metadata when there is no result