Re: ecmascript 5 DATESTYLE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: ecmascript 5 DATESTYLE
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRCEVRNFRZpCjA++YT-tBX5Zg0DZi+KT=c325075J7aRPA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ecmascript 5 DATESTYLE  (ben hockey <neonstalwart@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hello

2011/12/6 ben hockey <neonstalwart@gmail.com>:
> i may have spoken a little too soon about the format being right...  i just
> took a look at the postgres source code and it would need one more change to
> completely meet my needs.  EncodeDateTime should put a 'Z' for UTC timezone
> rather than '+0'.  with this being the case, do you think there would need
> to be an ECMA datestyle or would XSD be compatible with this change?
>

probably we can't to change a XSD format - but new format, that is
exactly ECMA should not be problem.

> i haven't touched any c code in quite a while but the changes look simple
> enough that i could work towards an ECMA patch if that's the best way to go
> about this.

you can become a postgreql's hacker :) - anybody starts on simple jobs

PostgreSQL hacking is good lecture


Pavel

>
> thanks,
>
> ben...


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: ben hockey
Date:
Subject: Re: ecmascript 5 DATESTYLE
Next
From: Marti Raudsepp
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Caching for stable expressions with constant arguments v3