Re: [HACKERS] merging some features from plpgsql2 project - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: [HACKERS] merging some features from plpgsql2 project
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRCE+mjSLsSmzX51fh=uYnUueBiSoaJYb7KBwjvJHX7YUw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] merging some features from plpgsql2 project  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] merging some features from plpgsql2 project  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


2017-01-08 4:11 GMT+01:00 Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com>:
On 1/7/17 8:53 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
If FOUND were declared at an outer scoping level such that any
user-created declaration overrode the name, then we could do likewise
for other auto variables and not fear compatibility breaks.

Currently, though, we don't seem to be quite there: it looks like
FOUND is an outer variable with respect to DECLARE blocks, but it's
more closely nested than parameter names.

Sorry, I'm not following... you can override a parameter name the same way and get the same behavior, no?

It is declared before any custom identifier. If you override it, then you are working with own variable - not with auto variable.
 

BTW, I do wish you could change the label of the scope that arguments went into, so that you could use that label to refer to function parameters. If we allowed that it'd perhaps be the best of both worlds: you'd be guaranteed access to all auto variables and parameters, and that access wouldn't need to be tied to the function name (which can be both painful and error prone).

We can talk about compiler directive. 

PRAGMA auto_variables_label(xxxx) -- require function scope only 

BEGIN
  IF xxxx.FOUND THEN
  
Regards

Pavel
 

--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] merging some features from plpgsql2 project
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Add support for SRF and returning composites to pl/tcl