Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRCCG_-5-U_OdLG0=Mxmiwn7ozAp38vozi79LxcRsDJMLw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c
List pgsql-hackers


2015-11-03 4:16 GMT+01:00 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>:
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> fixed patch attached

The documentation included in this patch doesn't really make it clear
why -g is different from or better than -c.

I wrote some text. But needs some work of native speaker.

Regards

Pavel
 


--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bill Moran
Date:
Subject: RFC/WIP: adding new configuration options to TOAST
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: BUG #13685: Archiving while idle every archive_timeout with wal_level hot_standby