Re: badly scaling performance with appending to bytea - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: badly scaling performance with appending to bytea
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRC4K6GrOSGRVTZUxDDeiA_oK5ZmWAAjYbTWnZ-rZ5kPVw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to badly scaling performance with appending to bytea  (Gary Cowell <gary.cowell@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: badly scaling performance with appending to bytea
List pgsql-performance


2018-03-21 13:03 GMT+01:00 Gary Cowell <gary.cowell@gmail.com>:
We are trying to implement postgresql code to load a large object into
a postgresql bytea in chunks to avoid loading the file into memory in
the client.

First attempt was to do

update build_attachment set chunk = chunk || newdata ;

this did not scale and got significantly slower after 4000-5000 updates.

The chunks are 4K in size, and I'm testing with a 128MB input file,
requiring 32,774 chunk updates.

Next, I tried creating an aggregate, thus:

(taken from stackoverflow)

CREATE AGGREGATE bytea_agg(bytea) (SFUNC=byteacat,STYPE=bytea);

changed the code to insert the chunks to a temporary table :

create temporary table build_attachment (seq bigserial primary key,
chunk bytea ) on commit drop;

we then insert our 4K chunks to this, which takes very little time (20
seconds for the 32,774 inserts)

Here's an example though of trying to select the aggregate:

gary=> \timing
Timing is on.
gary=> select bytea_agg(chunk order by seq) from build_attachment
where seq < 4000 \g output
Time: 13372.843 ms
gary=> select bytea_agg(chunk order by seq) from build_attachment
where seq < 8000 \g output
Time: 54447.541 ms
gary=> select bytea_agg(chunk order by seq) from build_attachment
where seq < 16000 \g output
Time: 582219.773 ms

So those partial aggregates completed in somewhat acceptable times but ...

gary=> select bytea_agg(chunk order by seq) from build_attachment
where seq < 32000 \g output
this one hadn't completed in an hour - the PostgreSQL connection
process for my connection on the server goes to 100% CPU and stays
there, not using much RAM, not doing much IO, oddly

EXPLAINing these aggregate selects doesn't show anything useful.

Am I doomed to not be able to update a bytea this way? Is there some
way I can tune this?


bytea is immutable object without preallocation - so update of big tasks is very expensive.

I am thinking so using LO API and then transformation to bytea will be much more effective

\lo_import path

you can use

 CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION attachment_to_bytea(attachment oid)
 RETURNS bytea AS $$
 DECLARE
  fd        integer;
  size      integer;
 BEGIN
  fd   := lo_open(attachment, 262144);
  size := lo_lseek(fd, 0, 2);
  PERFORM lo_lseek(fd, 0, 0);
  RETURN loread(fd, size);
 EXCEPTION WHEN undefined_object THEN
   PERFORM lo_close(fd);
   RETURN NULL;
 END;
 $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql STRICT SECURITY DEFINER SET search_path = 'pg_catalog';

function

import cca 44MB was in few seconds

Regards

Pavel

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Rick Otten
Date:
Subject: Re: badly scaling performance with appending to bytea
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: badly scaling performance with appending to bytea