On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2015-05-29 8:20 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>: >> >> Le 29 mai 2015 8:10 AM, "Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> a écrit >> : >> > >> > Hi >> > >> > I am not sure if PGXN can substitute contrib - mainly due deployment - >> > It doesn't helps with MS Windows. Installing necessary software for >> > compilation there is terrible. >> > >> >> I agree it's hard to compile an extension on Windows, but that's already >> what we have. And I'm sure EDB will put all interesting contrib modules in >> their windows installer to help users. They already go way further than any >> Linux packages. > > I afraid so dependency on EDB in this case is wrong - I have respect to EDB > due work, but installation other extension from EDB stack is difficult, > unclean, and nothing what I would to use as new base.
The five or six mouse clicks required to install something like Slony or PostGIS (or both at once) is difficult and unclean?
I had a problem with downloading isolated packages with stackbuilder - but it was specific, because comp where some packages was installed was not access to internet.
