On 2022-07-28 01:51, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> Would it be clearer to say: >> >> It also contains the OID of the intended procedural language and >> whether >> that procedural language is declared as <literal>TRUSTED</literal>. >> While these values are redundant if the inline handler is serving only >> a single procedural language, they are necessary to allow one inline >> handler to serve more than one PL. > > ok
I will probably be unable to produce a new patch for this CF. Family obligation.
