Re: PostgreSQL 12, JIT defaults - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: PostgreSQL 12, JIT defaults
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRBpdwVt4t_pXAkd7aUVWKu7hxwySab21Py6rsLWHwgiWQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL 12, JIT defaults  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers



>
>I am thinking so simple number should be good enough. We can require
>equality - Just I need a signal so some is wrong - better than Postgres
>crash.

It'd cause constant conflicts and / or we would regularly forget updating it. It's not that trivial to determine what influences ABI compatibility.

This can be checked by regress tests? I don't know. Maybe I am not too friendly, I am sorry. I spent 20 minutes by searching phantom, because JIT was active, although I wanted.

So any help against this situation can be welcome.

Regards

Pavel


Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 12, JIT defaults
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Removing variant expected-output files for float-output differences