Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRBoMpVHYUGZ+-VfLEdkAi3rQBNjYbnr-OJHvnwP8tgeag@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Responses Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


2015-11-05 17:17 GMT+01:00 Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>:
On 11/04/2015 10:46 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2015-11-05 7:39 GMT+01:00 Craig Ringer wrote:
>     I see constant confusion between \copy and COPY. It's a really good
>     reason NOT to overload other psql commands IMO.
>
> but crosstab is one old function from old extension with unfriendly
> design.

Hey, I resemble that remark ;-)

I am sorry, Joe - no any personal attack - I'll pay a beer for you if you visit Prague :)

Pavel
 

> When we support PIVOT/UNPIVOT - the crosstab function will be
> obsolete. It is not often used command.

But agreed, once we have proper support for PIVOT built into the
grammar, the entire tablefunc extension becomes obsolete, so perhaps
overloading \crosstab is not so bad.

Joe

--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Brain fade in gin_extract_jsonb_path()
Next
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql