Re: Migrate to autoconf 2.72? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: Migrate to autoconf 2.72?
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRB5LkOnPjZQH9Tkm4KQW7bU1vF6UZJxWqYMwPT5pE52wA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Migrate to autoconf 2.72?  (Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@tigerdata.com>)
Responses Re: Migrate to autoconf 2.72?
List pgsql-hackers


po 1. 12. 2025 v 11:42 odesílatel Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@tigerdata.com> napsal:
Hi Pavel,

>> No, there is currently no agreed schedule for this.
>
> almost all extensions has not meson support still

Extensions shouldn't necessarily be built using the same build system
as the PG core. I can build PG using Meson and then install a 3rd
party extension using `make install && make installcheck`. In other
words, we can stop supporting Autotools for building the core without
affecting extensions. Unless I'm missing something, of course.

But when you use autotools for extensions, then you still should to maintain it.

 

--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mihail Nikalayeu
Date:
Subject: Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
Next
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication