On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:2015-08-13 9:21 GMT+02:00 Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>:On 8/13/15 9:18 AM, Shulgin, Oleksandr wrote: nnulls() I think I'd prefer num_nulls() over that.can bewhat about similar twin function num_nonulls()?Yes. But I'm can't see any precedent for naming it like num_*... And if anything, should it be num_nonnulls() then?
2015-08-13 9:21 GMT+02:00 Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>:On 8/13/15 9:18 AM, Shulgin, Oleksandr wrote: nnulls() I think I'd prefer num_nulls() over that.can bewhat about similar twin function num_nonulls()?
On 8/13/15 9:18 AM, Shulgin, Oleksandr wrote: nnulls() I think I'd prefer num_nulls() over that.
nnulls()
pgsql-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных