Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRB-GSM6D3pamoctay24KtB+EyQtRDZTHw+zQTUy5uJwPQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


út 6. 11. 2018 v 18:18 odesílatel Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> napsal:
On 2018-Nov-06, Surafel Temesgen wrote:

> hi,
>
> On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 1:18 PM Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote:
>
> > Patch does not seem to apply anymore, could you rebase?
> >
> The attached patch is a rebased version and work by ‘inserts=100’ as
> Stephen suggest

I thought the suggestion was that the number could be any positive
integer, not hardcoded 100.  It shouldn't take much more code to handle
it that way, which makes more sense to me.


+1

100 looks really strange

Pavel

--
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: chenhj
Date:
Subject: Re:Connections hang indefinitely while taking a gin index's LWLockbuffer_content lock
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY