On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 06:10:24AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > I find the rules above so complex that I don't see how we can recommend > a best syntax. What I did in the patch I just posted was to put the > preferred operator first, but I don't see why we want to get into these > details in the docs. > > > just a note about preferred variant should be ok. Using ':=' in GET DIAGNOSTICS > statement is just bad idea.
Agreed. I added a sentence in the first mention of GET DIAGNOSTICS, and indicated it was generic for that command. What I also added was your description of when to use := and =, but I put it in the C comments so we have a record of it and if we need to expand the description or behavior later.
I'll be more happy if a comment about GET DIAGNOSTICS statement will be in user space.