Re: proposal \gcsv - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: proposal \gcsv
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRAye3Yi4axpM1J6Baw3AMoNrYPdxspAbFvVQwgog4HuUw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: proposal \gcsv  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: proposal \gcsv  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers


út 7. 4. 2020 v 19:27 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> napsal:
Here's a more fully fleshed-out patch, with documentation and some
test cases.  (0001 patch is identical to last time.)

Considering this is the last day before v13 feature freeze, should
I push this, or sit on it till v14?  I feel reasonably good that we
have a nice feature definition here, but it's awfully late in the
cycle to be designing features.

I am for pushing to v13. This feature should not to break any, and there is lot of time to finish details.

Regards

Pavel



                        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: SLRU statistics
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup